Phoenix1969
Lisker
Posts: 108
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 6:21 pm
Location: Hawaii
Contact: Website

Re: YYYY 600k+ LSK

Tue May 31, 2016 11:56 am

YYYY wrote:I do not like that there are a lot of accidental persons in the top101
I do not like that 98 seats are occupied by one party in the top101
I call it the centralization of power.
Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer.
Any alliance that is able to reduce the number of accidental people in the top101 can rely on my support at the critical moment.
48 + 48 + 5 are far better than 98+3.
Anything that harms the network hurts me personally.
Everything that is good for the network is good for me either


You need to realize that the Genesis delegates (current top 101) are provided and operated by Lisk HQ; and will be removed when the blockchain is deemed fully stabilized by the team.
Vote for Phoenix1969

bigfisher
Lisker
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2016 6:36 am

Re: YYYY 600k+ LSK

Tue May 31, 2016 2:59 pm

vote from bigfisher&liskjpvote (9046361520324371310L) 200000 LSK ├──>yyyy1: 11529172434884609814L
vote from liskjp_voting (8810133329012839765L) 110000 LSK ├──>yyyy1: 11529172434884609814L
Please vote back liskjp Rank 205
Vote for Elite group members

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=1468

User avatar
Croin
Lisker
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2016 11:46 am

Re: YYYY 600k+ LSK

Wed Jun 01, 2016 6:51 am

Hi YYYY,

I voted YYY1,YYY2 and YYY3 with 10170283860560194184L. Can you please vote me back on croinz rank 212 atm.

Thank you

YYYY
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu May 26, 2016 4:26 pm

Re: YYYY 600k+ LSK

Wed Jun 01, 2016 12:34 pm

$atoshi
heras11
tokyo01

and others
Just place the information about the votes in this topic.



xujian 2074128296889030323L (10'600 LSK)
current: 5523.19753481
please fix it

bigfisher
Lisker
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2016 6:36 am

Re: YYYY 600k+ LSK

Thu Jun 02, 2016 5:04 am

hi, YYYY, I added my weight voted for you like under:
vote from bigfisher&liskjpvote (9046361520324371310L) 200000 LSK ├──> yyyy1: 11529172434884609814L
├──> yyyy2: 9352447111810244518L
└──> YYYY3: 13253364846640936939L
vote from liskjp_voting (8810133329012839765L) 110000 LSK ├──> yyyy1: 11529172434884609814L
├──> yyyy2: 9352447111810244518L
└──> YYYY3: 13253364846640936939L
Please vote back bigfisher :Rank 121 and liskjp: Rank 202
Thank you very much
Vote for Elite group members

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=1468

leo
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2016 8:56 am

Re: YYYY 750k+ LSK

Sat Jun 04, 2016 9:20 am

Hi YYYY,

I voted for your YYY1,YYY2 and YYY3 with leo_vote1(about 203k) and leo_vote2(about 100k). please vote for me, account name: leo

Thank you

User avatar
GreXX
Lisker
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2016 1:35 am

Re: YYYY 600k+ LSK

Sat Jun 04, 2016 3:47 pm

YYYY wrote:I do not like that there are a lot of accidental persons in the top101
I do not like that 98 seats are occupied by one party in the top101
I call it the centralization of power.
Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer.
Any alliance that is able to reduce the number of accidental people in the top101 can rely on my support at the critical moment.
48 + 48 + 5 are far better than 98+3.
Anything that harms the network hurts me personally.
Everything that is good for the network is good for me either



There are no accidental persons in the 101. As per your own criteria, your approach to your proposal and your voting harms the network and isn't good for the network, so according to you, you are not good for you.

No matter what the arrangement is between the people who end up in the top 101, it won't be 48+48, it won't be 98+2, it will simply be 101 people. Would you rather have 101 people who were simply voted in only based on voting weight and what they can offer you, or would you rather have people in the 101 who have shown the ability to run the network efficiently, upgrade in a timely manner, and support the network at their own personal cost during testnet?

Is your issue with the people in the 101 that they talk to one another on chat? I talk to all people in chat, so no matter who is in the 101, I will collaborate and work together with them. To be honest, I would feel like it was a catastrophic failure if all of the people in the 101 DIDN'T work together. That is the nature of this system.

The current 101 outside of the genesis delegates, to my knowledge, contains 101 unique members who have all shown they can be good for the network. There needs to be more to the equation than just whether or not they can get you in the top 101 and returning 1 for 1 vote swaps. There should be trust and personal relationships. There should be vetting of who the person is and their intentions.

One mistake a lot of people are making is in not offering up ideas, solutions, or ways they think they could make Lisk better outside of just running a server. Let's be honest, anyone can run a server. It's not really that hard and there are tutorials all over the website and forum. You haven't offered up any ideas, solutions, or methods in which you plan to be good for the network outside of running a node. Running a node can cost as little as $100-$200. At current rates, if you are nominated into the 101, you stand to make roughly $5000+ a month off of just 1 node, let alone the 3 or 4 you are asking for (which is in and of itself counterproductive). The price is most likely to go up so that number will probably increase significantly.

What do you plan to do with the funds?

I'm not saying any of this out of hostility, you seem like a fine person, I'm saying it because I would like to hear more about your intentions and as to whether or not your only intention here is to make money from your candidacy.

Is there any chance you can provide more information about yourself, your background, any ideas you might have, or your intentions long term to support Lisk?

YYYY
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu May 26, 2016 4:26 pm

Re: YYYY 850k+ LSK

Mon Jun 06, 2016 12:46 am

Yesterday I got a message from liskgate about what he had voted for me a long time ago but did not get my vote back. But here I do not see any information about it. I see that some people voted for me, liskgate and several more persons, but I have no idea who are they, and for whom I should vote in response. So please, if you had voted for me, write here information about who had voted and for whom I should vote in response. Without this information, I tritely do not know for whom to vote for.

luxiang7890
Lisker
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:13 am

Re: YYYY 850k+ LSK

Mon Jun 06, 2016 4:13 am

Hi YYYY,
I voted for your YYY1,YYY2 and YYY3 with luxiang7890votes(about 50k) and luxiang7890_votes1(about 35k). please vote for me, account name:luxiang7890 Ranking: 222
Thank you

Xujian
Lisker
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2016 3:00 pm

Re: YYYY 850k+ LSK

Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:56 am

hi, YYYY, I added my weight voted for you like under:
vote from 7528256834654111074L will&xujian_300k ├──> yyyy1: 11529172434884609814L
├──> yyyy2: 9352447111810244518L
└──> YYYY3: 13253364846640936939L
vote from 17537498485568994528L will&xujian_150k ├──> yyyy1: 11529172434884609814L
├──> yyyy2: 9352447111810244518L
└──> YYYY3: 13253364846640936939L
vote from 14678954494283545345L will&xujian_50k ├──> yyyy1: 11529172434884609814L
├──> yyyy2: 9352447111810244518L
└──> YYYY3: 13253364846640936939L
vote from 10428980474212658324L ├──> yyyy1: 11529172434884609814L
├──> yyyy2: 9352447111810244518L
└──> YYYY3: 13253364846640936939L
Please vote back “xujian” :Rank 185 and “will”: Rank 218

Please check again

Thank you very much

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=409&p=5716#p5716
Last edited by Xujian on Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:26 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Return to “Delegates”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest